Who gets the final say on deportations and enforcement, Washington or the states? The high court faces some nettlesome questions—and some intriguing divisions.

In a potentially significant case about parody and intellectual property, the high court may get the last laugh.

The clock is ticking for the anti-democracy “independent state legislature” takeover.

The majority’s arguments in last year’s big gun-control ruling has touched off some truly chaotic interpretations from lower courts.

The moratorium on student loan payments will be extended to June 30, 2023, as courts consider legal challenges to Biden’s debt relief plan.

The ruling ends a three-year legal battle over the former president’s tax returns.

America’s best-known Supreme Court clerk mill is abandoning the U.S. News college rankings—and other schools are following suit. What are they playing at?

While members of the high court’s conservative bloc have historically taken a dim view of Congress’s investigative powers, they’re pointedly leaving this select committee alone.

Things aren’t looking good for Team Trump.

It’s an ironic twist in a year when Americans rallied to democracy’s defense.

The high court catches a case that’s both dizzyingly complicated and relatively simple: Are tribal governments a legitimate part of the U.S. constitutional order?

Democrats have advocated for years to add D.C. and Puerto Rico to the 50 states. There’s a constitutional path for statehood for tribes too.

Liberals can fight back against the high court’s attack on affirmative action by illuminating the inclusive constitutionalism of our founding documents.

After a slew of legal victories, this is a major setback for Team Trump.

After an epic day of oral arguments in two affirmative action cases, it’s clear that the conservative justices will do what they want regardless of facts, law, or precedent.

This is the third time the Supreme Court has saved Team Trump in the last week.

from Washington and beyond

As the Supreme Court prepares to consider two affirmative action cases, originalism will be put to a test.

Marjorie Taylor Greene says it proudly. But other leaders say there’s no such thing as Christian nationalism. It’s not liberals they’re trying to bamboozle—it’s their own supporters.

Not every state in the U.S. requires the fabled “12 angry men.” Some require as few as six jurors. Now the justices are being asked to rule on whether the number should be uniform.