It’s not every day the Roberts court hands out labor rights, but a plaintiff may have found the one neat trick for winning it over: religious freedom claims.

Can a nation’s sovereign immunity extend to a foreign financial institution? One bank accused of fraud and money laundering sure hopes so.

Six months after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, the decision is still seen as an electoral game-changer.

The Kentucky Republican just passed the Montana Democrat as the longest-serving Senate leader. Unfortunately, he’s dismantled everything Mansfield worked to build.

The day is coming when some Americans won’t accept a Roberts court decision that allows red states to reach into blue states and take people’s freedoms away. What then?

A concrete manufacturer argues that it can sue a union over a strike that unintentionally results in property losses.

The White House’s commitment to filling vacancies on the bench got a big boost when Democrats lucked into an expanded Senate majority.

The Framers would have never tolerated debt-limit brinkmanship. It’s time to put this terrible idea on trial.

The Calvinball court is at it again with its recent Title 42 decision.

After the Supreme Court eliminated the constitutional right to abortion, the country changed forever.

While our reliance on capital punishment continues to decline, this has only served to illuminate its increasing cruelty—and the incompetence of its practitioners.

The Supreme Court justice and his right-wing activist wife are working hand in hand to destroy American democracy.

Here are the humans who made our skin crawl this year—and a few who salvaged our faith in mankind.

A pair of plaintiffs are seeking redress over gallingly abusive property seizures, but it’s not certain that the Supreme Court will intervene.

It’s by no means clear that the high court will ultimately spike the administration’s loan forgiveness plan, but it will have a range of opportunities.

The just-passed defense spending bill includes provisions designed to protect judges from violence. But legal journalists say these measures infringe on their rights.

The hot new electoral subversion idea brewed up by the conservative legal movement may be too extreme for some of the Supreme Court’s conservatives.

Even if the justices uphold California’s law, they could still undermine states’ abilities to regulate on environmental or animal welfare grounds in the future.

The high court’s conservatives could alter protections for LGBTQ citizens based on a case whose plaintiff describes an entirely hypothetical injury.

The Trump-appointed judge, who tried to do the former president a favor in the Mar-a-Lago affair, received a stern correction from the Eleventh Circuit.