In allowing the government to kill a man amid a pandemic, the court's conservatives have declared their fealty to the death penalty.

Today's decisions may not provide the deus ex machina that brings down Trump, but they slam the brakes on runaway executive power.

In upholding the Muscogee (Creek) Nation’s treaty-guaranteed lands, the justices did something simple but unexpected.

Conservatives have prevailed in an effort to deny people bodily autonomy. That’s always been their fight.

If the Supreme Court no longer believes the lie that’s sustained this hastily concocted relic from our nation’s founding, why should anyone?

The justice’s dissent in a little-regarded case strikes an important blow against the right’s efforts to decimate the federal government.

The chief justice threads a judicial needle and hands the conservative legal movement another disappointing ruling.

The high court’s low profile on social media is a mistake—and a missed opportunity.

The Supreme Court grants a reprieve to hundreds of thousands of young, undocumented immigrants. Their fate will now be decided in the November election.

A Supreme Court case and a series of workplace uprisings raise the question: Whose jobs are really protected in this country?

A historic Supreme Court ruling arrives in the middle of an uprising for Black trans lives.

The rural, Native, Black, and Latinx communities protesting the controversial pipeline deserve clean, safe places to call home.

The conservative justice’s ruling in favor of gay, queer, and transgender workers shows the limits of the right’s Faustian bargain on judges.

Sam Sloan is a college dropout, an ex-con, and a polygamist. He is also the last non-lawyer to win a case at the Supreme Court.

The derangements of our current era could threaten the rock-solid legal precedents that provide states with the right to act in the interests of public health.

American democracy is broken. Here’s how to fix it.

Much like their client, the White House’s lawyers don’t seem to understand what a president does, but they’re not letting that stop them.

The public airing of Supreme Court arguments has laid bare just how ill-equipped the justices are to handle the basic tenets of Indian law.

Faced with having to choose between the president and Congress, the justices want to permanently abdicate their role as adjudicators.

It’s useless to convince him to adopt progressive policies if he won’t agree to structural reforms.