Here's what New York Times columnist Bret Stephens should have written about instead of his controversial, misleading op-ed.

They're in great demand by the media. But will many Americans even believe what they’re saying, or accuse them of partisan bias?

Bret Stephens might seem reasonable compared to conspiracy theorists, but his stealth denial is far more damaging.

Ideological diversity doesn't justify lowering argumentative standards for conservatives, or anyone else.

He's become too jaded and political to be the face of the movement.

Democrats need to understand what went wrong in 2016, but focusing on Clinton is a dead end.

Why is the magazine columnist so angry at her? Here's a theory.

Trumpism never existed. That's why the party won out over the president.

There is no "learning curve" for the president. He changes his tune for the same reasons a salesman does: to close the deal.