A pair of death penalty decisions reaffirms a sad fact about the high court: There is a majority of justices who want to keep the executions coming.

The rave reviews that the newest Supreme Court justice received on her debut were well deserved, but they’ve created a set of outsize expectations that she can never fulfill.

Clarence Thomas sat silent for years before he said a word. The court’s newest justice came out swinging at her first hearing.

If the Mar-a-Lago affair has taught us anything, it’s that as long as Trump-appointed judges exist, all bets are off.

A recent spat between a judge and Yale Law School forces us to consider whether the federal judiciary should continue to be a spoils system for the well connected.

Percoco v. United States would seem to be a pretty clear-cut case of political bribery. That the justices are even willing to hear it is a bad sign.

The Supreme Court is going to get a crack at Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act—and the internet may never be the same.

The high court is set to hear two major cases that could allow the conservative majority to redefine the Equal Protection Clause.

A rather odd plaintiff—with some convoluted legal arguments—has emerged to sue the administration over its loan forgiveness proposal.

Right-wing judicial hegemony presents a daunting challenge for liberal leaders—but not an insurmountable one.

With the former president facing accountability on multiple fronts, how desperate—and dangerous—is he going to become?

Americans’ antipathy toward the high court is deepening—and for the first time, a slim majority favors expansion.

The massive civil suit launched by New York Attorney General Tish James describes the former president’s family business as a nesting doll of financial chicanery.

House Democrats on Wednesday passed their reform of the Electoral Count Act. The Senate has a different reform bill in mind. Only one can win.

The former president’s hoarding of classified documents is the least complicated of his scandals—and it’s also proving the hardest to dodge.

He cites a constitutional clause that should shield him from questioning. But he has the history and the precedent wrong.

The law firm Jones Day was crucial to Trump’s presidency. How much responsibility does the firm bear for his legacy?

The Florida judge’s concern for 45’s reputation is not only laughable but flies in the face of constitutional law.

A trio of American Samoan plaintiffs are asking the high court to end their status as second-class citizens.

The former White House adviser has a new nonprofit dedicated to hindering Biden’s agenda.