Democrats: Prepare to Pack the Supreme Court
If Republicans refuse to let the other party govern, all options should be on the table.
If Republicans refuse to let the other party govern, all options should be on the table.
Why are the justices hearing fewer cases and taking longer to decide them?
Waves of redistricting have allowed politicians to select their own voters, consolidating one-party power across America—mostly among the GOP.
The Supreme Court wrestles with how to apply U.S. laws to international tech companies.
In obliging the state to directly aid Trinity Lutheran and other churches, the Court is allowing the religious right to have their cake and eat it, too.
That Republicans are on the verge of repealing the law can be partly attributed to the tortured legal reasoning of Chief Justice John Roberts.
Democrats have always prided themselves on being a voice of political sanity. So why has Trump's election turned the left into a breeding ground for conspiracy theories?
The conservative justice this week joined the court’s four liberals in striking down two gerrymandered districts in North Carolina. How come?
The judge's selective approach to constitutional originalism raises serious questions about his respect for the Second Founding after the Civil War.
The Supreme Court hears a case on Tuesday that has tremendous implications under the Trump administration.
President Obama's former attorney general will be at the forefront of legal challenges to the Trump administration. Will they work?
One Trump Supreme Court pick probably won’t change the status quo. But two definitely will.
A string of judiciary defeats could result in a more devastating one: a Supreme Court hostile to voter ID laws.
A look back at the court's major decisions in the Obama era—and what it means for the Court's future.
Will Scalia’s grand constitutional theory have a lasting legacy on the Supreme Court?
Senate Republicans plan to paralyze the nomination process. Here's a way forward for the chief justice this year.
The court's past rulings on Obamacare could prove decisive in a case that is up for consideration this week.
A legal mastermind seeks to gut affirmative action and voting rights by rewriting the Fourteenth Amendment
It was the correct ruling, but John Roberts's dissent completely outmatched him