Justice Sonia Sotomayor called out her conservative colleagues for ignoring a “mountain of precedent.”

The Supreme Court justice took aim at her conservative colleagues’ supposed originalist beliefs.

The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case on whether states can ban gender-affirming care for minors.

In Friday’s ruling on domestic violence and the Second Amendment, the other eight justices rejected his approach to originalism.

The justices opened the door for legislation on a wealth tax.

The Supreme Court justice noted her conservative colleagues quickly abandoned their textualist principles in the ruling on bump stocks.

Hint: It comes from what Roberts said, not Alito.

As Chief Justice John Roberts refuses to meet with Democrats, Senator Sheldon Whitehouse addresses whether hearings involving Samuel Alito’s upside-down flag would be an appropriate next step.

Roberts is refusing to engage over Alito’s flags scandal.

The Fifth Circuit's become little more than a junior varsity version of the Supreme Court. Sending some new judges to the Lone Star State will help put things right.

Will the Supreme Court intervene like it did with Donald Trump?

Her entire candidacy was predicated on the notion that she’d be there if Trump’s legal woes caught up with him. Two controversial high court rulings ended that dream.

The justices unanimously ignored the plain text of the Fourteenth Amendment to keep Trump on the Colorado ballot—but some of them ignored their oaths as well.

The justices spent Thursday’s oral arguments looking for an off-ramp from kicking the former president out of the presidential race.

The Supreme Court carved out an exception for the military academies to continue considering race as a factor in admissions. Right-wing activists aim to shut it down.

The recent Texas razor-wire case highlights the way the justices can use the so-called “shadow docket” to resolve disputes while obfuscating their rationale.

At oral arguments, Chief Justice John Roberts emerged as the likely deciding vote in a case that will determine whether unelected judges take control of the administrative state.

At Tuesday’s oral arguments, the justices seemed bent on a narrow ruling that would preserve the tax code—and not preemptively rule a wealth tax unconstitutional.

But the conservative majority seemed less inclined to upend the administrative state.

The high court’s new guidelines have come in for a lot of criticism, but they’re the perfect platform for reformers to keep applying pressure.