The high court’s most unusual case of the current term will determine if our trademark laws are all bark and no bite.

Why a relatively young legal doctrine has become all the rage among the court’s right-wing majority

There are enough justices who seem to oppose the president’s proposal on the merits. That doesn’t mean there are enough votes to strike it down—yet.

The hot new electoral subversion idea brewed up by the conservative legal movement may be too extreme for some of the Supreme Court’s conservatives.

Who gets the final say on deportations and enforcement, Washington or the states? The high court faces some nettlesome questions—and some intriguing divisions.

Right-wing judicial hegemony presents a daunting challenge for liberal leaders—but not an insurmountable one.

Americans’ antipathy toward the high court is deepening—and for the first time, a slim majority favors expansion.

The justices consistently ruled against plaintiffs who had their constitutional rights violated—and, in some cases, their bodies abused—by police, the Border Patrol, and the CIA.

In their scathing dissent, the court’s minority write that their fellow justices have abandoned any claim to legitimacy.

Campaign graft continues its long-running undefeated streak at the Supreme Court.

The high court’s ruling in a 2020 case upended Oklahoma’s relationship with Indian country. Now the justices are considering an even bigger step.

The court did not foreclose robust new workplace vaccination standards, nor bless the radical right’s blueprint for annihilating the “administrative state.”

Wednesday’s oral arguments in a challenge of Mississippi’s abortion law reveal that a majority of justices want to gut abortion rights in America.

The high court’s unusually generous predisposition to faith-based claims takes a back seat to Samuel Alito’s determination to end the “guerrilla war on the death penalty.”

The high court will decide whether the First Amendment prevents elected bodies from disciplining their own members.

In the dead of night, the Supreme Court’s conservatives erased abortion rights in Texas—and signaled what they would do next.

The Republican Party’s ongoing effort to scuttle electoral democracy got a big boost from Justice Samuel Alito and his colleagues.

Don’t be fooled by the burst of moderation from the justices this term.

His recent ruling shreds a precedent that offered criminal defendants a chance to challenge unjust sentences—and reveals how the court’s conservative bloc has no boundaries.

The high court’s irreconcilable conflict over the sentencing of young criminals is a product of the mess the former justice left behind.