But the conservative majority seemed less inclined to upend the administrative state.

The justices heard a case challenging a federal law restricting guns for domestic abusers—and saw an opportunity to clean up the mess their previous gun ruling has caused.

Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito are defiant, the rest are varying levels of quiet.

Instead of greeting the most recent set of decisions from the Roberts Court with downcast disses, critics should recognize—and celebrate—the way they influenced the results.

At least one Supreme Court justice thinks something needs to change.

The chief justice doesn’t like his conservative Supreme Court colleagues getting called out for judicial overreach.

A case involving the EPA’s protection of wetlands somehow became a forum for some fiery justice-on-justice warfare over textualism.

The high court’s ruling on the nature of “transformative” works of art could have major ramifications for artists working today—as well as the A.I. enthusiasts looking toward tomorrow.

The high court’s most unusual case of the current term will determine if our trademark laws are all bark and no bite.

Why a relatively young legal doctrine has become all the rage among the court’s right-wing majority

There are enough justices who seem to oppose the president’s proposal on the merits. That doesn’t mean there are enough votes to strike it down—yet.

The hot new electoral subversion idea brewed up by the conservative legal movement may be too extreme for some of the Supreme Court’s conservatives.

Who gets the final say on deportations and enforcement, Washington or the states? The high court faces some nettlesome questions—and some intriguing divisions.

Right-wing judicial hegemony presents a daunting challenge for liberal leaders—but not an insurmountable one.

Americans’ antipathy toward the high court is deepening—and for the first time, a slim majority favors expansion.

The justices consistently ruled against plaintiffs who had their constitutional rights violated—and, in some cases, their bodies abused—by police, the Border Patrol, and the CIA.

In their scathing dissent, the court’s minority write that their fellow justices have abandoned any claim to legitimacy.

Campaign graft continues its long-running undefeated streak at the Supreme Court.

The high court’s ruling in a 2020 case upended Oklahoma’s relationship with Indian country. Now the justices are considering an even bigger step.

The court did not foreclose robust new workplace vaccination standards, nor bless the radical right’s blueprint for annihilating the “administrative state.”