Joe Kennedy’s phony tale of religious discrimination may have reached a predictable end this week, but it illuminated an important truth about the Supreme Court.

It’s not every day the Roberts court hands out labor rights, but a plaintiff may have found the one neat trick for winning it over: religious freedom claims.

The high court’s conservatives could alter protections for LGBTQ citizens based on a case whose plaintiff describes an entirely hypothetical injury.

He won’t rest until the Supreme Court enshrines religious freedom protections for a select minority of Americans—at the expense of everyone else.

The Hollywood-friendly church says its “religious arbitration” system—rather than civil courts—should apply to ex-members who say they were sexually assaulted by actor Danny Masterson. It hopes the Supreme Court agrees.

The Roberts court is showing a troubling propensity to be the willing dupe of plaintiffs with the right kind of tale to tell.

The conservative bloc’s recent religious rulings went much further than merely obliterating the firewall between church and state.

The high court’s drive to radically redefine our Constitutional rights continues apace.

Conservatives are increasingly embracing a version of religious freedom that’s designed to sow unnecessary divisions in society.

The flagpoles in front of Boston’s City Hall have become the source of a most vexing debate about religious freedom in the public square.

The high court’s unusually generous predisposition to faith-based claims takes a back seat to Samuel Alito’s determination to end the “guerrilla war on the death penalty.”

As anti-vax plaintiffs seek faith-based exemptions, the judicial system will renew its struggle to determine what beliefs are truly “sincerely held.”

Religious exemptions from getting inoculated are coming to a federal court near you.

The court’s liberal and conservative bloc combined to deliver a needle-threading ruling on a major religious freedom challenge.

An opaque court filing in an anti-LGBTQ discrimination case has advocates asking if this administration will “bargain down” the rights of students to reach an uneasy peace with Republicans.

Under the guise of “religious liberty,” the conservative justices are privileging certain Americans at the expense of the rest of us.

Amy Coney Barrett’s ascension to the high court could have an immediate, and lasting, impact on how the United States governs public health crises.

The Roberts court is poised to undo the late Justice’s landmark ruling on religious freedom and government overreach.

Inside the court battle over trans employment discrimination

Desperate to stand out, he has proposed perhaps the worst idea of the Democratic primary.