A renewed zeal for regulatory reform among Democrats shouldn’t tear down the infrastructure that keeps us safe, but it should eliminate all the obstacles that make it annoying to access.

The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals just threw a major wrench into the effort to protect the planet—and teed up another chance for the Supreme Court to take a bite out of the administrative state.

The paper may not have a great history of covering the federal workforce, but their timely series on the dedicated professionals threatened by the former president is a boon to democracy.

In his new book he rails against the regulatory state and explains why judges should have its power instead.

The high court sent nine cases back to the lower courts in light of recent rulings weakening federal agency authority.

The Supreme Court justice ripped her conservative colleagues’ “flawed” decision to kneecap the federal government.

Justice Kagan issued a scathing dissent of her conservative colleagues, who she claims are desperate for power.

The Supreme Court has overturned decades of precedent on the administrative state—transferring more power to the judiciary.

Thursday’s ruling in Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jarkesy avoided the worst-case scenarios.

He and his allies are planning to “deconstruct” the administrative state by stripping its power and forcing out tens of thousands of workers. That will put all of our lives at risk.

The administrative state is squarely in the high court’s crosshairs. But public pressure has successfully kept the justices from going over the brink before—and it might work again.

At oral arguments, Chief Justice John Roberts emerged as the likely deciding vote in a case that will determine whether unelected judges take control of the administrative state.

The former president made little headway while in office against the administrative state, but the Roberts court is ready to step in.

Two cases this term might cement a new order of judicial supremacy—and end the idea of a government by “We the People.”

Liberal pressure contributed to an unexpected tempering of the conservative justices’ extremes last time out. We’ll know soon if that will endure.

In a brief stop in Washington, the presidential hopeful reassured a room of devotees that he and his ideas were, in fact, brilliant.

The Biden administration has taken some bold steps to bolster the civil service after Trump’s attempt to transform it into an instrument of authoritarianism.

The justices will have a chance to further disrupt the balance of power between the courts, Congress, and the White House.

Justice Samuel Alito is inventing a new way for the high court to substitute its own judgment for that of lawmakers.

America’s top civics knower also promises to pile on more corporate deregulation—even after the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and the derailment in East Palestine.