You are using an outdated browser.
Please upgrade your browser
and improve your visit to our site.
Skip Navigation

Words You Don't Hear Every Day

John Derbyshire is making sense:

Some readers want me to pass comment on David Klinghoffer's Darwin-inspired-Hitler piece.

As so often with creationist material, I'm not sure what the point is. Darwin's great contribution to human knowledge, his theory of the origin of species, is either true, or it's not. Is David saying: "When taken up by evil people, the theory had evil consequences. Therefore the theory must be false"? Is he asserting, in other words, that a true theory about the world could not possibly have evil consequence, no matter who picked it up and played with it, with no matter how little real understanding? Does David think that true facts cannot possibly be used for malign purposes? If that is what David is asserting, it seems to me an awfully hard proposition to defend. It is a true fact that E = mc2, and the Iranians are right at this moment using that true fact to construct nuclear weapons. If they succeed, and use their weapons for horrible purposes, will that invalidate the Special Theory of Relativity?

I don't know, on second thought, Klinghoffer's argument sounds like a compelling and intellectually rigorous historical analogy that could easily be expanded into a bestselling political book.

--Josh Patashnik